One of the most disliked aspects of modern life is the tendency toward centralization is the drift toward conglomeration. To its critics, this leads to a world of products made without passion or distinction. Trying to withstand this tidal wave of multinational corporate dominance, independent book publishers hang on almost against all hope.
When it comes right down to it, the distinction between independent and conglomerate owned publishers is clear. The first has as its ultimate authority a person who entered the industry out of a passion, or at least interest, in books and reading. This offers just a little hope that final decisions about books will reflect that genuine interest, bringing to light the best manuscripts submitted to the marketplace and not just the likely fastest sellers.
Many of those who run these houses are graduates of our country's Master of Fine Arts programs. These programs have the traditional role of carrying on the teaching of the craftsmanship needed for the finest work in various arts. Conventionally, these graduates might have hoped for careers teaching their art as a college professor or perhaps high school teacher. This would pay the bills while the degreed artist grew steadily more renowned among his or her peers.
With the growth in MFA graduates, there simply are not nearly enough teaching jobs to create any reasonable expectation of an academic career. This situation is compounded by the deepening crisis of the shrinking audience for the fine arts overall. It has become increasingly obvious that the arts must be fought for in the public sphere.
Increasingly, MFA graduates recognize the business of art as at least as urgent a problem as its teaching. There has long been a sense that the classical music audience has been declining, but the decline has become a free fall in this century. MFA programs keep adding new courses that teach the business of being a publisher.
A lot of the difficulty lies in the ubiquity of the personal computer. There's no question that it has made the arts more widely available. However, the internet has proven itself a liability to efforts to monetize much fine art.
There is worry about an even more direct effect of technology that tends to depress the consumption of challenging art. The public shows signs of having its attention span shortened by the ever more frenetic pacing of mass media. It is not uncommon to come across young people who cannot tolerate black and white movies, much less silent film. Those living such a quick-twitch lifestyle are not likely to sit through a modern dance performance, or even to hear of it.
The new millenium at least manages to open a door for every one it seems to close. Those heroically staffing then small publishing houses might romanticize the modernist 1920s, when the work seemed to matter even to many who could not read it. But the future could just belong to the lone self-publisher working on a laptop, even the one lacking an MFA.
When it comes right down to it, the distinction between independent and conglomerate owned publishers is clear. The first has as its ultimate authority a person who entered the industry out of a passion, or at least interest, in books and reading. This offers just a little hope that final decisions about books will reflect that genuine interest, bringing to light the best manuscripts submitted to the marketplace and not just the likely fastest sellers.
Many of those who run these houses are graduates of our country's Master of Fine Arts programs. These programs have the traditional role of carrying on the teaching of the craftsmanship needed for the finest work in various arts. Conventionally, these graduates might have hoped for careers teaching their art as a college professor or perhaps high school teacher. This would pay the bills while the degreed artist grew steadily more renowned among his or her peers.
With the growth in MFA graduates, there simply are not nearly enough teaching jobs to create any reasonable expectation of an academic career. This situation is compounded by the deepening crisis of the shrinking audience for the fine arts overall. It has become increasingly obvious that the arts must be fought for in the public sphere.
Increasingly, MFA graduates recognize the business of art as at least as urgent a problem as its teaching. There has long been a sense that the classical music audience has been declining, but the decline has become a free fall in this century. MFA programs keep adding new courses that teach the business of being a publisher.
A lot of the difficulty lies in the ubiquity of the personal computer. There's no question that it has made the arts more widely available. However, the internet has proven itself a liability to efforts to monetize much fine art.
There is worry about an even more direct effect of technology that tends to depress the consumption of challenging art. The public shows signs of having its attention span shortened by the ever more frenetic pacing of mass media. It is not uncommon to come across young people who cannot tolerate black and white movies, much less silent film. Those living such a quick-twitch lifestyle are not likely to sit through a modern dance performance, or even to hear of it.
The new millenium at least manages to open a door for every one it seems to close. Those heroically staffing then small publishing houses might romanticize the modernist 1920s, when the work seemed to matter even to many who could not read it. But the future could just belong to the lone self-publisher working on a laptop, even the one lacking an MFA.
About the Author:
You can get a detailed summary of the factors to consider when choosing a book publisher and more info about independent book publishers at http://whitebirdpublications.com right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment